Loading Icon

Why Tennessee Security Guard Turnover Is a Management Problem, Not a Worker Problem

There's a narrative in the Tennessee security industry that guard turnover is simply the nature of the work: low-skill, entry-level, high-attrition by design. I disagree with that narrative pretty fundamentally, and I think it's used to avoid accountability for management decisions that drive turnover.

The security industry has the highest turnover rates of any service sector in Tennessee. Industry estimates run from 100 to 300 percent annually, meaning the average company is replacing its entire workforce once or more per year. That costs money. It costs clients consistency. And it's built on a foundation of decisions that most security companies could change if they chose to.

The Compensation Problem

Tennessee's private security industry has historically clustered starting wages near the state minimum. Security officers are expected to work nights, weekends, and holidays for pay that doesn't reflect either the responsibility of the role or the undesirable scheduling. The result is predictable: workers take the job while looking for something better, and leave when they find it.

Companies that pay meaningfully above minimum wage for security roles see lower turnover. Not because they've magically attracted a different type of person, but because they've given people a reason to stay. Paying an officer $16 or $17 per hour instead of $11 costs the company more per hour. But when you factor in recruiting costs, training costs, and the operational degradation of constant turnover, higher-wage companies frequently have lower total labor costs.

The Scheduling Problem

Erratic scheduling is a turnover accelerant. Officers who don't know their schedule week to week can't plan around their job, can't arrange childcare, can't take a second job to make ends meet, and can't have a stable life outside work. This isn't a problem unique to security. It's a known factor in turnover across service industries. Companies that offer predictable schedules, even for part-time roles, see better retention.

The Training and Respect Problem

Many Tennessee security companies deploy officers with minimal training and no ongoing development. Workers who are given no opportunity to learn or advance have no reason to stay. Treating officers as interchangeable components rather than as professionals compounds this. People stay in jobs where they feel valued and competent. The security industry has historically done a poor job of creating either condition.

What This Means for Clients

When you hire a security company, you're absorbing the downstream effects of their management decisions. High-turnover companies put inexperienced, unstable officers on your property and call it coverage. Low-turnover companies that pay and treat their officers well put the same faces on your site week after week, and those officers actually know your property.

Ask your security provider about their turnover rate before you sign a contract. If they don't know the number, that tells you something. Our approach to officer retention is central to how we deliver quality for our clients across the Memphis area. Learn more about our standards on our security officer page, or call (202) 222-2225 to have a direct conversation. Contact us any time.